The editorial team discusses the reports and the Editor makes the final decision. waiting to send decision to author npj. How long one should wait on an editor's decision depends on a variety of factors - your stature within your profession, the quality of the journal to which you submitted the manuscript, and the. Please see our editorial policies page for details and to download the Reporting Summary document. Failure to promptly complete these steps will result in delay of publication. All authors must also complete an editorial policy checklist to ensure compliance with Nature Portfolio editorial policies. If the manuscript does not match the scope of the journal or does not meet the standards of the journal, it will be returned without review. Author: Soto, Albert Created Date: 01/14/2014 08:36:00 Last modified by: Soto, Albert Company: 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida . Commun. If the funder has played no role in the research, this should be stated. Alternatively, authors may choose to request a fresh review, in which case they should not use the automated transfer link, and the Editors will evaluate the paper without reference to the previous review process. There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably availability of article referees. Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, do not currently satisfy our authorship criteria. For proposed gene names that are not already approved, please submit the gene symbols to the appropriate nomenclature committees as soon as possible, as these must be deposited and approved before publication of an article. Authors will see a proof that will include figures. How do I find and access my journal's submission system. However, it might be a good idea to send in a reminder to the editor as this can sometimes help quicken the process. 2016513Chem Liu, L.; Ruiz, David A.; Munz, D.; Bertrand, G., A Singlet Phosphinidene Stable at Room Temperature. Author IJ holds shares in [company name A] but and declares no non-financial competing interests. Scale bars should be used rather than magnification factors, with the length of the bar defined. | Codes and software should be available and properly referenced in the article and/or supplementary information. Authors are permitted to post the final, published PDF of their article on a website, institutional repository or other free public server, immediately on publication. Global integrated drought monitoring and prediction system (GIDMaPS) data sets. For more information about the npj Series and a list of journals, see https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio/about/npj-series. The Editor has recommended the submission be transferred to another journal, and your response is needed. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Authors should provide a cover letter that includes the affiliation and contact information for the corresponding author. Volume numbers and the subsequent comma appear in bold. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories). The Editors have begun a decision in the system. Any data necessary to evaluate the claims of the paper that are not available via a public depository should be provided as Supplementary Information. Recoloring primary data, such as fluorescence images, to color-safe combinations such as green and magenta or other accessible color palettes is strongly encouraged. Please note that schemes are not used; sequences of chemical reactions or experimental procedures should be submitted as figures, with appropriate captions. RH performed the histological examination of the kidney, and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. J. Editorial Manager displays status terms as described in the table below. The Editors then make a decision based on the Reviewers' advice, from among several possibilities: (a) Accept, with or without editorial revisions (b) Invite the authors to revise their manuscript to address specific concerns before a final decision is reached (c) Reject, but indicate to the authors that further work might justify a resubmission (d) Reject outright, typically on grounds of specialist interest, lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual advance or major technical and/or interpretational problems. Authors are encouraged to seek copy editing or language editing services for their manuscripts, either before submission or at the revision stage, should they feel it would benefit their manuscript. and JavaScript. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. You have completed the submission and approval steps, and the article has been submitted to the journal. If the manuscript was peer reviewed the referee comments are also transferrable on request by the author. The underlying code for this study [and training/validation datasets] is not publicly available but may be made available to qualified researchers on reasonable request from the corresponding author. LJ. Authors are responsible for obtaining permission to publish any figures or illustrations that are protected by copyright, including figures published elsewhere and pictures taken by professional photographers. The homogeneity and purity of solid state compounds may be characterized by solid state NMR, powder X-ray diffraction data and where possible compared to calculated diffraction patterns. Best practices for authors of healthcare-related articial intelligence manuscripts Since its inception in 2017, npj Digital Medicine has attracted a disproportionate number of manuscripts reporting on uses of . G Protein Coupled . Commercial suppliers of reagents or instrumentation should be identified. The primary affiliation for each author should be the institution where the majority of their work was done. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. We ask that you keep this in mind when suggesting potential Reviewers. If you require assistance, please scroll down and use one of the contact options to get in touch. Do explain how you plan to rectify any major shortcomings pointed out by the editor or by the referees. Liu, L.; Ruiz, David A.; Munz, D.; Bertrand, G., A Singlet Phosphinidene Stable at Room Temperature. Small sample size: When the sample size is small (less than about 10), authors should use tests appropriate to small samples or justify their use of large-sample tests. The corresponding author should be familiar with the journals Editorial policies and is solely responsible for communicating with the journal and managing communication between coauthors. Notably an attribution of authorship carries with it accountability for the work, which cannot be effectively applied to LLMs. Comprehensive information on the statistical analyses used must be included in the paper. Chem. figshare) and use their option to provide a private sharing link for the referees to access it. Nevertheless, articles published in these sections, particularly if they present technical information, may be peer-reviewed at the discretion of the Editors. Online only: npj Precision Oncology (npj Precis. English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. As there are many steps involved in the editorial process, this may in some cases take longer than you had anticipated. | DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2016.04.001generalspecialized, Science Nature Science Nature general science, JACS Angewandte Chemiegeneral chemistryspecializedAnalytical Chemistry, UCSDGuy BertrandGuyACS Award in Inorganic Chemistry (2014)GuyInorganic Chemistry Dalton Transactions Chemistry-An Asian JournalGuyDalton TransactionsChemistry-An Asian Journal general interestsChemical Communications Organic Letters Chemical Communications Organic Letters OL, Chem X-MOLGuy9Science Science, Science wordGuycover letterJACS Angewandte Chemie cover letterunder evaluationto advisoradvisorgeneralAAASemail2advisorchemistrygeneral science, Science GuyNatureNature ChemistryNature wordNature Guy, Nature manuscript receivededitor assignedmanuscript under considerationFigure 1GuyNature emailNature general scienceNature Nature Chemistry Nature Chemistrypeer reviewGuyDavidNature Chemistry is not bad., 50decision sent to authorwaiting for revisionFigure 2DavidUCSDfacetime50f**king awesomeGuyemailDavidimessageGuy, 1Guy, 3, Guy1Guy80201email1, GuyDavidNature Chemistry DavidBlack FridayGuyInorganic Chemistry1waiting for revision, Cell PressChem158Cell PressDr. How do I check the status of my manuscript? The corresponding author should indicate whether the work described in the manuscript has been discussed with a specific Editor at npj Vaccines before submission. In these cases, authors must provide evidence of identity based on sequence (when appropriate) and mass spectral characterization. A useful resource is Entrez Gene, available from NCBI. To obtain 4.5. Units should have a single space between the number and the unit, and follow SI nomenclature (for example, ms rather than msec) or the nomenclature common to a particular field. The decision letter will specify a deadline, and revisions that are returned within this period will retain their original submission date. Authors should note that some funders require papers to be published under a specific licence and so should check the funder mandate to ensure compliance. If the decision is negative, the author can choose to transfer their manuscript to another journal. The cover letter is not shared with the referees, and should be used to provide confidential information, such as conflicts of interest, and to declare any related work that is in press or submitted elsewhere. | npj Series referee reports, whether signed or not, are subsequently shared with the other Reviewers. Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. We strive to ensure that the diversity of our Reviewers reflects that of the broad scientific community, in terms of gender, ethnicity/race, geographic location and career stage. Authors should provide sequencing or functional data that validates the identity of their biological constructs (plasmids, fusion proteins, site-directed mutants, etc.) The Reviewer identities and their full reports willbe transferred, and although the journal Editors will take the previous reviews into account when making their decision, the Editors will likely choose to take advice from additional or alternative referees. Data sets should be summarized with descriptive statistics, which should include the n value for each data set, a clearly labeled measure of centre (such as the mean or the median), and a clearly labeled measure of variability (such as standard deviation or range). They will send a request for final submission accompanied by detailed instructions for final changes that need to be made. Editorial decision making and the peer review process. [CDATA[// >

Homes For Sale In Utila, Honduras, Who Is Vivian On That '70s Show, Kansas High School Tennis Rankings 2022, Emma Zielke Parents, All Charges, Payments, And Adjustments Are Recorded On The, Articles W