The Explore 100 comes a very close second to Tele Vue in sharpness, with stars sharp across 90 percent of the field and still well contained at the edge. Nice detail of the moon and the cloud bands on Jupiter. Pros: Best eye relief and off-axis star images. Like the Ethos, it can be used as either a 2-inch or 1.25-inch eyepiece. 100 degree eyepieces are quite amazing but they are also very large and can be quite heavy. The eyepieces rival Televue but they were sold to fund an Ethos. A 100 degree field of view provides the user with almost 1.5 times the area of an 82 degree eyepiece. I do not wear glasses while observing and a 70-degree field of view is very comfortable. Accessories, Astrophotography gear, Reviews. Optical performance also proved similar, with stars in the Meade beginning to distort 60 percent out from the center and appearing fairly aberrated at the edge of field. Pros: Solid construction with good eye relief. This eyepiece is ideal for higher power work on planets and double stars since it is very sharp, contrasty and has a generous 82 degree field of view. Which points out that the appropriate high power apparent field depends a lot on the focal length of the scope and whether the scope is tracking. They are still the best but are expensive. Another good example is the 50mm finderscope, from both WO and SV (I have both, mostly the same, both excellent). For me, anything 60 degrees or greater feels sufficiently wide. Fancy eyepieces are expensive, simpler eyepieces can be nearly as good and much more affordable. I see only two, a 9mm and a 6mm. Yes, for standard 1.25" and 2" eyepiece filters. Unfortunately EP focal lengths are rarely exactly accurate and in the case of the axioms they were obviously paying homage to the original 23mm axiom and 24mm was close enough to call a 23. Incredible clarity across the entire field of view. Alan Dyer is an astrophotographer and astronomy author based in Alberta, Canada. It eliminates the need to rebalance the telescope. FWIW I looked at the Pleiades yesterday with a 32mm Plossl, a 24mm UFF (~65 AFOV) with my XT10 which has the same focal length as your telescope. I find I kind of have to make myself use them more often. Now if you had a more expensive 30mm EP, that FOV will remain sharper to the edge. Get a chair! 70 is fine at low power, 78-85 fine at medium power, but I prefer 110 at high power. *Measured with eye cup rolled down. Collecting EP's is a journey for sure in finding out what you really like. All of these factors add up to create an extremely contrasty eyepiece that is free of unwanted reflections, flaring or ghosting. Has similar build quality to TeleVue and has a better feel than its APM counterpart. We all have different preferences for eyepieces. That is unless it's purely coincidental that these appear to be the same as well-known OEM UWAs, and in fact Vic actually designed and manufactured every single one of them by hand using his automated CNC lathes, grinding and polishing equipment, and then triple tests them before shipping them to the user. The Omegons weight is 600 grams, at the lower end of the range for eyepieces in this group. Especially comparing them to the ES line. eyepiece will limit observer significantly. Stellarvue makes great scopes and youll love yours. Pros: Low price; good eye relief; solid construction. Even if they arent perfectly sharp to the absolute edge Im sure theyll be fine for most of the usable viewing range which should be good. Pros: Lightest 100 with good eye relief. Stars are sharp across all but the outer 10 to 15 percent of the field, so very close to Nagler performance. Uhno. In my scopes, I generally use the 3.5 mm Nagler with the 2X TV Barlow as my highest magnification. Though if you want the best, this is it. We recommend this as the ideal deep sky eyepiece for viewing nebulae, clusters and galaxies. A 20mm eyepiece with a 100 field for only $300 seems too good to be true! Introducing the new Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece series. If the grading system of your university uses letter grades, you can assign a number to each letter grade. In the AD8 . Edit: For clarification, I am referring to the apparent field of view of eyepieces, not the true field of view. Building an set of eyepieces takes some time. Congrats! Top 100 Worldwide. The eye relief is comfortable but a bit tight at around 12mm. LMU - Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitt Mnchen. I'm hoping they will be sharp to the edge at f/7. Munich, German Mnchen, city, capital of Bavaria Land (state), southern Germany. The eyepiece is turned my 115 into a whole new scope for visual observing. Grade Conversion using the Bavarian Formula. While the NexStar SE/Evolution Celestron, Celestron Tabletop Tripod, NexStar SE. Light Benders: 2" Astro-Physics MaxBright, 2" iStar dielectric, 2" Stellarvue Deluxe, 2" TAL/ NPZ dielectric, 2" Baader Amici prism . Though advertised as 82, Celestrons 15mm Luminos had an apparent field between that of the 76 Morpheus and the other 82 models. You probably won't notice the difference. Not quite so easy a question. When using hand driven alt-azimuth mounts this generous field will be appreciated. The 9mm Optimus was tack-sharp across the 100 FOV. It is Bavaria's largest city and the third largest city in Germany (after Berlin and Hamburg). There are more expensive products, but do they perform any better? I test ZWOs new ASIAir Mini. All marketing. I think these are the same that WO(?) Honestly, I don't mind a 50-degree view, but 70 is definitely more immersive. In the AD8, the APM delivers tack-sharp stars to the edge. I don't use 2" eyepieces that much so I'm not interested in the 28mm, and for some reason the 7mm eyepieces that I have are rarely used. That makes swapping eyepieces at high magnifications easier. I have the WO versions of these and find them very good, indeed! The Stellarvue 82 is well made, with a compact, solid construction, good 14mm of eye relief (better than the stated 12mm) and a fold-up eyecup. The Stellarvue 82 is well made, with a compact, solid construction, good 14mm of eye relief (better than the stated 12mm) and a fold-up eyecup. The new PWA has an improved design with a standard fold-up rubber eyecup and good eye relief. I find that the longer the focal length of the scope, the more I wanted wider apparent fields. These wider fields allow me to see things with my peripheral vision and make the whole experience that much more comfortable and enjoyable. I present them in order of increasing price. The eye has to be a little above the eyecup for best position, with eye relief just 12mm. As the object, or area of an object, being viewed, often take up a very small area of the field of view. if(sWOTrackPage)sWOTrackPage(); These are $65 or so.., Observing in Northern/Southern Michigan, USA, The NEAF Report from nPAE Precision Astro Engineering. At under $200 this eyepiece is a great way to get those wide views at a reasonable price. I find the Televue better, but both the ES and UWA are very close. But it just matters on if you need the eye relief or not, the AT UWA 28 would be great as well if not wearing glasses. Cons: Soft off-axis star images. The 28mm has a 2" barrel, the rest are 1.25". Effect of barlows / field flatness for AT60ED solar imaging, Jon Isaacs, SpaceConqueror3 and mrsjeff like this, sportsmed, edsmx5 and Someone4322 like this, Dave Mitsky, John Huntley, CeleNoptic and, izar187, pj_thomas and Alex Swartzinski like this. For planets 30-40 deg. The only cost I had to eat was shipping, but spending $20 to rent an eyepiece is worth it to me. The amount of head tilt needed to see the edges of the field are less than other ~100 degree eyepieces, including Ethos, ES, and APM. The one piece of information I have not been able to find here or on other forums is what FOVs people prefer, whether the specified field of view is at specific focal lengths or in general. And of course your first light with the other eyepieces and the sweet SV80A (it's on my short list!). (1) it seems that for observer favorite FOV is defined by nature of human eye: 120-140 deg. Both have the same true FOV and cover the cluster nicely. Be informed, it can't hurt you. But I can't confirm, and they could be a whole new OEM same as the luminos perhaps, rather than the initial SV82 which I am pretty sure was the UWAN. He sells a 4.9mm and a 6.1mm, I also have his 2.9mm which seems to have been dropped from the lineup. But its the design and optical ease of a design that makes an eyepiece good for me. You sometimes feel more like you are actually there, in the view. The grades represent the following assessments of the examination performances: Talent Development, Scholarships and Awards, Verification of Study Periods for Pension Insurance, Mission Statement and Teaching Constitution, TUM Center for Digital Leadership Development, Digital Programs of Executive and Professional Education, Office of the Senior Executive Vice President, TUMonline TUMs campus management portal, Academic and Examination Regulations (FPSO), resolution of the Kultusministerkonferenz, 1.01.5 very good: excellent performance, 1.62.5 good: performance well above average, 2.63,5 satisfactory: average performance, 3.64.0 sufficient: performance meets the standards in spite of deficiencies, from 4.1 fail: performance does not meet the standards because of substantial deficiencies. Do you search for top universities and information on admission requirements, language certificates (TOEFL/IELTS) and application deadlines? Can't beat it for the price, especially since the market has gone insane. At 564 grams even with its 2-inch adapter tube, Stellarvue's Optimus is the lightest of the 100 set, a consideration for balancing smaller telescopes. Buy all three of our high end 82 degree eyepieces and save! Its smaller, lighter, and cheaper than the bigger ASIAir Plus astrophoto computer, but is it as good? The main drawback is the massive 833 gram weight, by far the highest of the 100s. Hmmm, looks like those four focal lengths are the only ones they make, at least for now. Stellarvue 8mm UWA 82 degree eyepice that has never been used. (2011) 1,348,335; (2021 est . Good luck and clear skies! Based on the 14mm SSW, I can recommended the series, though they are even more costly than Nagler Type 6s. Haven't noticed these before. I tested these on f/6 apo refractors and f/5 to f/6 Newtonian reflectors, concentrating on comparing on-axis and off-axis sharpness. 8 & 10 Ethos has a bit more light transmission, but this EP is a fraction of the cost , and well worth it! 51,000 students. The 4.5mm Morpheus is sharper than the Ethos SX, by a hair. New from Stellarvue, ultra-wide eyepieces. Bottom Line: The standard of performance for 100 eyepieces. I present them in order of increasing price. This is like binge watching 4 seasons of a great show with a total cliff-hanger at the end of season 4, only to have the network cancel the show. It just felt like a 68-degree field that was pushed slightly further out. That's easier with the smaller size of the 82 Naglers when compared to the 100 eyepieces, however I'm working on that. Toss-up, both a bargain @ $200. Does anyone know anything about the new Stellarvue UWA's? : Despite its modest price and sharp optics, I cant recommend it. We are not all the same when it comes to eye relief requirements, especially when choosing an eyepiece that has more elements than the 5 element budget wide field types. I've had both and they are excellent (and same price)! $65 a piece is very cheapfor these eyepieces, so you did a very good deal there. How are the new Orion SkyQuest dobsonians? The Orion and Vixen 82 eyepieces are also superb in all aspects, though at prices similar to Tele Vue. Eye relief is an excellent 17 mm, longer than in more premium models, and the eyecup is extendable. This is not recommended for shared computers. Each of the eight elements are fully multi-coated, edge blackened and the lens barrel and baffles are similarly dark black. Pinpoint stars to the edge, M27 is amazing in my 14" Dobsonian. Note: For definitions of basic eyepiece characteristics mentioned below, see Ed Tings A Beginners Guide to Telescope Eyepieces. Stellarvue 8mm UWA Ultra Wide Angle 82 degree 1.25" Eyepiece - New. Guess I never answered the OP's real question here - favorite FOV, lol. They make a good addition to the Stellaruve brandedplanetary eyepieces he has already been selling. Astronomy Clubs, Star Parties, Shows, & Conferences, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights. As good as these 82 eyepieces are, if your budget allows, you might want to consider an even wider 100 eyepiece. Its barrel fits only 2-inch focusers and so requires more costly 2-inch filters. Bottom Line: Economical but with optical flaws. Several functions may not work. Please note: Internationally, grading systems used at institutions of higher educations may differ substantially. i think that what you are going to hear is : "what are you interested in looking at ?" Bottom Line: A superb eyepiece for 2-inch focusers. With some help from the members here, I'm awaiting a 28mm 82 degree Stellarview EP. Will 1.25 inch eyepieces fit ES coma corrector? The knurled grip rings and construction of both are superb. Cons: Heavy and 2-inch only; shorter eye relief. Though advertised as 80, I found the apparent field matched a Naglers 82 field. I've had both and they are excellent (and same price)!

What Grade Is Bronny James In 2021, How To Make Rosary Bracelet With Elastic, How Much Do Gas Stations Pay For Lottery Tickets, Gravesend Gurdwara Wedding Cost, Grisons Switzerland Surnames, Articles S